The search for lead-free perovskite absorbers for solar cell technology has to strike a balance between performance, stability, and environmental safety, all of which have to be achieved in the presence of high material uncertainty. The traditional methods of screening materials, relying on deterministic criteria or average performance indicators, have been demonstrated to be inadequate in assessing the robustness of candidate materials in the presence of high variability. Here in this work, we propose a probabilistic material ranking scheme, which includes Monte Carlo simulation, probabilistic ranking, and the Relative Scenario Value (RSV) metric. Three scenarios for solar cell technology, including rooftop solar, long-life solar cells, and environment-friendly solar cells, have been formulated by assigning different weights to the descriptors of efficiency, stability, and toxicity. The performance distribution, uncertainty limits, and ranking stability of candidate materials have been evaluated using a typical set of lead-free perovskite solar cells. The results show a strong distinction between "generalist" and "specialist" materials, in terms of their ranking robustness. The proposed probabilistic scheme for material ranking has been able to establish a strong link between uncertainty quantification and scenario-driven decision metrics for solar cell technology.
- Zewen Xiao, Yanfa Yan, (2017). Progress in Theoretical Study of Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cell Materials, Advanced Energy Materials, 7 (22), https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201701136
- Gao, S., Bae, J., Lee, D.S., Yang, T., & Shin, S.S. (2025). Toward Sustainable Perovskite Solar Cells: From Lead‐Free Materials to Environmental Concerns and Mitigation Strategies. EcoMat.https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.70001
- Vaish, S., Dixit, S.K., Ahmad, S., Ahmed, F., & Khan, Z.H. (2024). Lead–Free Perovskite Solar Cells: A Review. Energy & Environment Advances 1 (4) 146-161, https://doi.org/10.69626/eea.2024.0146
- Pitaro, E. Tekelenburg, Shuyan Shao, M. A. Loi, (2022). Tin Halide Perovskites: From Fundamental Properties to Solar Cells, Adv. Mater., 34, 2105844, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202105844
- Meyer, E.L., Mutukwa, D., Zingwe, N., &Taziwa, R.T. (2018). Lead-Free Halide Double Perovskites: A Review of the Structural, Optical, and Stability Properties as Well as Their Viability to Replace Lead Halide Perovskites. Metals. 8, 667, https://doi.org/10.3390/MET8090667
- Jin, Z., Zhang, Z., Xiu, J., Song, H., Gatti, T., & He, Z. (2020). A critical review on bismuth and antimony halide based perovskites and their derivatives for photovoltaic applications: recent advances and challenges. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 8, 16166-16188.https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta05433j
- Crovetto, A. (2024). A figure-of-merit-based framework to evaluate photovoltaic materials, Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.14732
- Bagher, A.M., Vahid, M.M., & Mohsen, M. (2015). Types of Solar Cells and Application
American Journal of Optics and Photonics, 3(5) 94-113, https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajop.20150305.17
- Xue, H., Birgersson, E., & Stangl, R. (2019). Correlating variability of modeling parameters with photovoltaic performance: Monte Carlo simulation of a meso-structured perovskite solar cell. Applied Energy 237, 131-144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.066
- Horowitz, K.A., Nielson, G.N., Sigrin, B., Cunningham, D.W., & Majumdar, Z.K. (2019). Analysis of the Value Proposition of High-efficiency, Multijunction Solar Modules for Residential Rooftop Installations. 2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2533-2540, https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8981129
- Peters, I.M., & Sinha, P. (2021). Value of stability in photovoltaic life cycles, IEEE 48thPhotovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 0416-0419, https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518480
- Wang, Z., Zhang, C., Han, E., Xu, H., He, D., Zhang, B.W., Chen, P., Lyu, M., & Wang, L. (2026). Low-toxicity Light-absorbing Materials for Indoor Photovoltaic Applications. Mater. Chem. A, 14, 6772-6793, https://doi.org/10.1039/D5TA07584J
- Groves, C., &Greenham, N.C. (2014). Monte Carlo simulations of organic photovoltaics. Topics in current chemistry, 352, 257-78, https://doi.org/10.1007/128_2013_467
- Castelli, I.E., Thygesen, K.S., & Jacobsen, K.W. (2017). Computational High-throughput screening for Solar Energy Materials, Materials Science, Environmental Science, Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315152424-7
- Wangbai Pan, Guoan Tang, and J. Tang (2017) Assessment of uncertainty effect in piezoelectric metamaterial, Proc. SPIE 10165, Behavior and Mechanics of Multifunctional Materials and Composites, 101650K, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2260366
- Vins, M. &Gangur, M. (2024). Simplified Methodology of Economic evaluation of Household PV Installations in Czech Republic using Monte Carlo method. Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 22(4), 345-355. https://doi.org/10.15598/aeee.v22i4.240406
- Garni, H.Z., & Awasthi, A. (2020). A Monte Carlo approach applied to sensitivity analysis of criteria impacts on solar PV site selection. Handbook of Probabilistic Models, 489-504, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816514-0.00020-5
- Bhatt A., Abbassi B.(2023), Relative sensitivity value (RSV): A metric for measuring input parameter influence in life cycle assessment modeling, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 19 (2) 547–555, https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4701
- Yin Y, Zhang X, Nam HN, Phung QM, Yuan K, Li B, Kong F, Alowasheeira A, Wang B, Li L, Yamauchi Y(2025) Enhanced Efficiency and Stability of Tin Halide Perovskite Solar Cells Through MOF Integration. Small. 21(10):e2411346. doi: 1002/smll.202411346.
- Malik, I., Ryabova, E., &Skumanich, A. (2010). Materials considerations for PV markets: Guideposts for technology directions. 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 002873-002876.
- Ghosh, B., Chakraborty, S., Wei, H., Guet, C., Li, S., Mhaisalkar, S.G., & Mathews, N. (2017). Poor Photovoltaic Performance of Cs3Bi2I9: An Insight through First-Principles Calculations. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 121, 17062-17067 https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JPCC.7B03501
- Correa‐Baena, J., Nienhaus, L., Kurchin, R.C., Shin, S.S., Wieghold, S., Hartono, N.T., Layurova, M., Klein, N.D., Poindexter, J.R., Polizzotti, A., Sun, S., Bawendi, M.G., & Buonassisi, T. (2018). A-Site Cation in Inorganic A3Sb2I9 Perovskite Influences Structural Dimensionality, Exciton Binding Energy, and Solar Cell Performance. Chemistry of Materials, 30, 3734-3742 https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.CHEMMATER.8B00676
- Hongwei Lei, D. Hardy, F. Gao (2021) Lead‐Free Double Perovskite Cs2AgBiBr6: Fundamentals, Applications, and Perspectives, Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2105898, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202105898
- Hossain M.K., Islam S., Sakib M., Uddin M., Toki G.F., Rubel M., Nasrin J., Sara., Shahatha H., Mohammad M.R., Asma A. Alothman, Raorane C.J., Haldhar R., Bencherif H.(2025), Exploring the Optoelectronic and Photovoltaic Characteristics of Lead‐Free Cs2TiBr6 Double Perovskite Solar Cells: A DFT and SCAPS‐1D Investigations, Adv. Electron. Mater. 11, 2400348, https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202400348
- Joy S, Hossain T, Tichy A, Johnson S, Graham KR. Defect Modulation via SnX2 Additives in FASnI3Perovskite Solar Cells. J Phys Chem Lett. 2024 15(14) 3851-3858. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00505
- Uddin M., Hossain M.K., Md Uddin B.,TokiG.F., Ouladsmane M., Rubel M.H.K., Tishkevich D., Sasikumar P., Haldhar R., Pandey R. (2024), An In‐Depth Investigation of the Combined Optoelectronic and Photovoltaic Properties of Lead‐Free Cs2AgBiBr6 Double Perovskite Solar Cells Using DFT and SCAPS‐1D Frameworks, Electron. Mater. 10, 2300751, https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202300751.